With the ongoing issue happening at the Magodo Phase 2 Estate, Lagos State, the Attorney -General and Commissioner for Justice, Lagos State, Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN) has spoken about the unknown bailiffs that carried out the execution. Lagos State speaks on Magodo invasion. Moyosore Onigbanjo, on Thursday, in a statement, set forth the invasion as unwarranted
With the ongoing issue happening at the Magodo Phase 2 Estate, Lagos State, the Attorney -General and Commissioner for Justice, Lagos State, Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN) has spoken about the unknown bailiffs that carried out the execution.
Lagos State speaks on Magodo invasion.
Moyosore Onigbanjo, on Thursday, in a statement, set forth the invasion as unwarranted and illegal, stating that those found reprehensible would be prosecuted.
The statement read in part: “It is a known fact that judgment was delivered in 2012 by the Supreme Court in Military Governor of Lagos State & Ors. Vs. Adebayo Adeyiga & Ors in Appeal No: SC/112/2002 wherein the apex court affirmed the judgment of Court of Appeal and High Court delivered on December 31, 1993, in Suit No: ID/795/88 wherein the court held as follows:
“I hereby enter judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants as follows – a declaration that members of the Shangisha Landlords Association whose lands and or buildings at Shangisha village were demolished by the Lagos State Government and/or its servants or agents during the period of June 1984 to May 1985 are entitled to the first-choice preferential treatment by the Lagos State Government before any other person(s) in the allocation or re-allocation of plots in Shangisha village.
“And I make the order against the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants (particularly the Lagos State Government and Land Use and Allocation Committee) as agreed in the meeting held on October 16, 1984, with the Ministry of Lands and Housing and Development Matters, Lagos State.
“An order of Mandatory Injunction is hereby made that the said defendants shall forthwith allocate 549 plots to the plaintiffs in the said Shangisha village scheme in the Shangisha village aforesaid.”
Attorney -General and Commissioner for Justice, Lagos State, Moyosore Onigbanjo, further stressed on the issue that, “it was obvious that the judgment only recognized the judgment creditors as being entitled to first choice preferential treatment in the allocation and or re-allocation of plots in Shangisha Village, adding that the judgment only related to the allocation of 549 plots of land and not the possession of any land”.
The Attorney General said the state government engaged the judgment creditors between 2012 and 2015 and made a proposal to re-allocate land to them at Magotho Residential Scheme within the Badagry area, adding that the move was rejected by Chief Adebayo Adeyiga.
He, however, stated that the majority of the judgment creditors led by Yemi Ogunshola, Jelili Yaya and Adeleke Adefala, accepted the offer.
“Due to division within the judgment creditors, another round of settlement was initiated in 2016 which culminated in the proposal to re-allocate the judgment creditors to Ibeju Lekki Coastal Scheme situated at Ibeju/Lekki, which was also rejected by Chief Adebayo Adeyiga.
“Subsequent to the rejection, the state government has been in dialogue with the majority of the judgment creditors from 2019 with a view to reaching a concession towards implementing the judgment,” Onigbanjo added.
The Senior Advocate of Nigeria explained that a pending application for interlocutory injunction dated December 1, 2020, before the Court of Appeal in Appeal No. CA/L/1005A/2018 sought an order restraining Adeyiga and others, including their agents, servants’ privies, or howsoever called, particularly the police, from entering into, giving direction, taking possession, or in any manner disturbing the quiet enjoyment of property owners in Magodo Residential Area Scheme.
He said: “The Lagos State Government has equally observed that the execution was carried out by unknown bailiffs as the Sheriff of the High Court of Lagos where the judgment emanated was not responsible for the purported execution carried out on December 21, 2021, at Magodo.” He added.
Stating that the Supreme Court judgment was not affixed to any land anywhere and that it only declared that the judgment creditors were entitled to allocation of land from the state government, Onigbanjo said the state government was dismayed by Adeyiga’s action.
He noted that Adeyiga misled the police in attempting execution of the judgment notwithstanding the pending appeal against the issuance of a warrant of possession by the then Chief Judge of Lagos State on March 16, 2017.
He urged the public, especially residents of Magodo Residential Area to remain calm, Onigbanjo noted that “investigation into the unwarranted incident is being carried out with a view to prosecuting any person found culpable. The Lagos State Government has the high regard for the rule of law and will protect the interests of all parties.”